Siambr · Member of the Senedd · Register of record
Figures in Plenary
Seventh Senedd, to : 28 sittings held while this Member sat.
- Last spoke in Plenary
- Contributions in Plenary
- 23
- Speaking time in Plenary
- 29 m 36 s
- From 19 timed contributions
- Words spoken in Plenary
- 3,734
- As the Record gives them, chairing excluded
- Share spoken in Welsh in Plenary
- 3%
- 104 of 3,734 words
- Votes cast in Plenary
- 100%
- 70 of 70 divisions held while sitting
- Oral questions tabled in Plenary
- 4
- By the Record’s OQ reference; supplementaries not counted
- Written questions tabled
- 52
Counted by Siambr: sums of the Record’s own rows, in Plenary only. Members are not ranked or compared with a chamber average.
The Senedd records no government position on a vote, so Siambr does not say whether a Member voted with the government.
Committees
Committee transcripts are not held yet, so no figure here counts committee work.
Tenures
- Seventh Senedd Afan Ogwr Rhondda Reform UK
Ministerial roles
No ministerial roles on record.
Contributions, by sitting day
23 contributions on record, newest first. Official verbatim record.
2 contributions
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the First Minister cy
1. Pa sicrwydd y mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi'i geisio gan Fwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf Morgannwg ynglŷn â'u trefniadau diogelu a chapasiti ymwelwyr iechyd? OQ64801 [R]
Official English translation
1. What assurances has the Welsh Government sought from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board about their safeguarding arrangements and health visiting capacity? OQ64801 [R]
No broadcast timestamp published, so this contribution cannot be placed on the stage. Senedd TV Read this in the Record
1. Questions to the First Minister en
Diolch, First Minister. I accept that the health board is the employer, but holding it to account on child safety is your responsibility. On 16 September, your Cabinet Minister for health told this Chamber that he had sought and received detailed assurances on safeguarding. Eight days later, the board's own nursing director proposed only qualified assurance on safeguarding, and limited assurance on capacity, warning that reduced contact diminishes opportunities to identify hidden harm. That is the child nobody yet knows is at risk. When the First Minister was first told about the safeguarding and capacity concerns, its quality committee's paper records 'ministerial requirements'. On 13 October, you spoke of full transparency. Then let families see the evidence. Within seven days, will you publish what Ministers required, what the board replied and the number of child health contacts missed or deferred—totals, not names? Diolch.
3 contributions
Open this sitting on the stage
3. Questions to the Senedd Commission cy
7. A wnaiff y Comisiwn gyhoeddi'r arfarniad o gostau oes gyfan ac opsiynau ar gyfer dyfodol Tŷ Hywel cyn llofnodi unrhyw gontractau rhwymol pellach? OQ64760
Official English translation
7. Will the Commission publish the whole-life costs and options appraisal for the future of Tŷ Hywel before signing any further binding contracts? OQ64760
No broadcast timestamp published, so this contribution cannot be placed on the stage. Senedd TV Read this in the Record
3. Questions to the Senedd Commission en
Thank you for that. This decision will commit public money for decades, and Members need to see the figures before the Commission commits to the deal. On 8 October, officials told the Finance Committee that the business case uses a 50-year appraisal period. The Commission has also confirmed a right to renew the existing Tŷ Hywel lease for a further 25 years. That option must be tested on a like-for-like basis against the preferred proposal. Will the Commissioner publish a comparison of the whole-life costs of both options, covering rent, refurbishment, temporary accommodation and maintenance? Will it use the same appraisal period and set out the assumptions made beyond the renewal term? And will Members have sufficient time to scrutinise that comparison before any further binding contractual commitment is made? Diolch.
-
Thank you to the Member for raising this. Cabinet Minister, I spent over 20 years with South Wales Fire and Rescue Service, so I recognise the efforts of crews, Natural Resources Wales officers, and everyone containing pollution. But the facts are deeply concerning: kerosene from GE Aerospace's Nantgarw site has affected around 4 km of the Taff. Dead fish have been recovered, residents have been advised to close windows and doors, and fumes are present. GE Aerospace said it isolated the source on Friday, yet on Monday Natural Resources Wales said it was still investigating the drainage system to stop further pollution. Stopping the original leak is not the same as stopping pollution reaching the river. And this is not the first time; in 2024, pollution from PB Gelatins UK in Treforest killed fish. The outcome announced this June was the enforcement undertaking, including a £50,000 donation and nearly £15,000 in costs. Cabinet Minister, you chaired the committee that reported Natural Resources Wales's own concerns that its fines and sanctions weren't enough to deter polluters. You now oversee Natural Resources Wales. Our Reform manifesto commits us to dismantling and fundamentally restructuring Natural Resources Wales, bringing strategic policy under ministerial oversight while environmental protections continue without interruptions. The public deserve to know what went wrong, who is accountable and who will pay to put it right. So, Cabinet Minister, will you commit to a written statement to this Senedd within 14 days, setting out how much fuel was released, the damage identified so far, the timetable for Natural Resources Wales's investigation and any enforcement decision, and how all legal recoverable costs will be pursued from those found responsible and not the Welsh taxpayer? Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
7. Statement by the Cabinet Minister for Finance: An Update on Council Tax en
Diolch, Ddirprwy Lywydd. Cabinet Minister, families across Afan Ogwr Rhondda needed certainty, and so I give you credit for finally giving them the answer. But when the previous Government put 2028 into law, the Institute for Fiscal Studies hoped that would prevent further delays. Today, you're proposing 2032, beyond another Senedd election. So, you say protecting households that face higher bills could cost up to £80 million in the first year. The previous Government estimated £11.7 million to implement revaluation over 2026-27 and 2027-28. So, before asking this Senedd to approve another four-year delay, will you publish exactly how much taxpayers' money has already been spent or committed, including with the Valuation Office Agency, and what postponing the programme will cost? Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the Trefnydd, Chief Whip and Cabinet Minister for Culture and Sport en
Diolch, Deputy Llywydd. Cabinet Minister, accessible sport means good facilities close to home, with affordable, fair access to every club, school and girls' team. I welcome your expansion support for artificial pitches. In May 2024, the then Cabinet Secretary told this Chamber that the Rhondda third generation facility was a Welsh Rugby Union priority, with Coleg y Cymoedd identified as a potential solution. She urged partners to work towards applying in the following financial year. More than two years on, our community needs a clear route forward. Will you confirm whether an application has been submitted for that proposal, and whether this year's funding could support a modern fourth generation all-weather rugby pitch that meets the required standards for training and competitive matches while the Sport Wales audit proceeds? Diolch.
2 contributions
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the First Minister cy
4. Pa gamau mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn eu cymryd i ddatrys yr anghydfod o ran tâl ymwelwyr iechyd a graddio ym Mwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Cwm Taf Morgannwg? OQ64682 [R]
Official English translation
4. What action is the Welsh Government taking to resolve the health visitor pay and grading dispute at Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board? OQ64682 [R]
No broadcast timestamp published, so this contribution cannot be placed on the stage. Senedd TV Read this in the Record
1. Questions to the First Minister en
First Minister, I accept the health visitor dispute began before you took office, but it has continued under your Government, affecting vulnerable children and families in my constituency. In March, Heledd Fychan, who now sits in your Cabinet, asked the previous First Minister to intervene. Luke Fletcher reminded the Government that it was, in his words, 'setting the policy and funding the services.' Then, on 17 April, you signed a letter calling for band 6 health visitors to be upgraded to band 7. Yet your Cabinet Minister for health continues to describe this as a local employment dispute between Unite and the health board, with no fixed timetable for resolution. First Minister, you now set the policy, you fund the services, and you signed the call for band 7. So, I ask you plainly: will your Government provide the funding necessary to deliver band 7 for these health visitors? 'Yes' or 'no'?
3 contributions
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the Cabinet Minister for Health and Care en
I'd like to declare an interest, as my partner works within the NHS. Cabinet Minister, in Afan Ogwr Rhondda, around 27,000 people are living with cardiovascular disease, and it causes more than one in four deaths—around 630 people every year. More than 36,000 people are living with diagnosed high blood pressure, one of the biggest risk factors for heart attacks and strokes. Your programme for government commits to strengthening cardiovascular care and reducing regional variation. My constituency is served by both Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board and Swansea Bay University Health Board, so reducing regional variation matters directly here. We do not need another plan for its own sake; we need action that reduces preventable heart attacks, strokes and premature deaths. So, by 31 March 2027, will you set both health boards a published, measurable target to increase the proportion of patients with high blood pressure whose condition is under control—yes or no? Thank you.
7. Reform UK Debate: Regional rugby en
This debate is not about nostalgia, and it is not about politicians trying to run the Welsh Rugby Union. It is about whether Wales should lose a quarter of its men's professional game before anyone has shown that it must. The union has already fixed the destination: three teams from 2028. Cardiff and the Dragons have been offered the capital and east licences, and the Ospreys and Scarlets are left competing for one licence in the west. Yet, by the Welsh Rugby Union's own timetable, the process is set, the licensing framework does not begin until December. So, how can the destination already be decided when the framework has not yet been determined? We know one region must go before. We know the test that it will be judged by. That is the wrong way round. I accept the financial argument must be taken seriously. The union says there is no realistic prospect of the game generating enough revenue to fund four professional teams competitively beyond 2028. We should not dismiss that because we dislike the conclusion, but the assertion is not a demonstration. So, publish the evidence, the business case for the three against four and the impact on the community that loses its team. Because Afan Ogwr Rhondda is not excepted. Aberavon are playing their hundred and fiftieth season this year, with Ospreys-allocated players in their squad. That is what a player pathway looks like in practice. And once it is dismantled, rebuilding it is far harder than removing it. My constituency and yours, Cabinet Minister, knows what losing a region feels like. In 2004, the Celtic Warriors, the region built on Bridgend and Pontypridd, were wound up after a single season. The Welsh Government cannot simply reply that the union is independent—of course it is—but independence is not immunity from scrutiny. In 2021, £13.5 million of Welsh Government survival funding went into rugby; £2.7 million went to the union, and the rest was divided equally between the four regions, the Ospreys and Scarlets included. And Sport Wales put £434,945 into the Welsh Rugby Union in 2025-26. On 16 September, the Cabinet Minister told this Chamber that it's important to ensure that any decisions are transparent, evidence based and take full account of the wider impact on Welsh rugby. Those are her tests. But you cannot take full account of the impact nobody has measured. As my colleague Steven Rodaway told this Chamber, the day before, the Minister's answer to his written question confirmed that the Welsh Government had undertaken no assessment of the economic or community impact. The amendment tabled by the Cabinet Minister would delete the call to protect four regions. It says that 'decisions of this significance must be informed...by a full assessment of their wider social, community and economic consequences.' I welcome that recognition, but if the Government does not assess them, who will? And will the assessment happen before the decision or after it? So, my question to the Cabinet Minister is this: she has told the Chamber that there are always discussions between the Government and the union. Will she use those discussions to ask the union, before the licensing process begins in December, to publish the business case for three teams against four and its assessment on the impact on community clubs and player pathways, and will she publish the reply? There is a difference between asking for another round of engagement and standing up for the future of four regions. People in my constituency are not asking Ministers to run rugby. They are asking them to stand up for the communities rugby depends on. That's why I support the motion as tabled. Diolch yn fawr.
10. Short Debate: The importance of port infrastructure and maritime traffic to the Welsh economy en
Diolch, Deputy Llywydd. And thank you to Ben for giving me a minute to contribute. Wales's ports are not simply gateways for freight, they are strategic economic assets, and nowhere is more at stake than Port Talbot. The UK Government is backing the development of a floating offshore wind port there, and the Celtic Freeport projects up to 11,500 jobs. But the port alone won't deliver; it needs roads, rail, grid and skills. The free port's own five-year plan names grid connections as a blocker, and for the first five years prioritises laying the foundations for future skills interventions. So, will the Welsh Government publish every year how many of these jobs go to Welsh workers, and how much of the spending reaches Welsh businesses, so our ports become engines of prosperity rather than gateways through which the economic value passes? Thank you.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
2. Questions to the First Minister en
This month, the Cabinet Minister said lower bills would come eventually. I want the claim put into pounds and pence for Afan Ogwr Rhondda. The previous Labour Government approved £430,000 for Community Energy Wales and YnNi Teg in 2025-26. CEW is co-led by your party's former leader, Leanne Wood. Ministerial advice calls it sponsorship to act as a voice for the sector and build its capacity. Audit Wales told me it had done no audit work referring to CEW since 2022—fair enough; that's the Government's job. Yet, in December last year, officials told me that, beyond a foundational economy evaluation, there were no further evaluation reports. So, will the First Minister publish what these organisations have achieved against their grant targets and this year's funding, and tell my constituents how many households will pay less under his strategy, by how much a year, and from when? Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the First Minister en
First Minister, I recognise that £85 million has been invested in flood risk management this year, but Rhondda Cynon Taf's investigation into storm Dennis has found that Blaenllechau was flooded from the steep hillside above it, that felling on Welsh Government-owned Natural Resources Wales-managed woodland may have contributed to surface water run-off, and that modelling suggested three of the four culvert networks lacked adequate capacity. This August, a major wildfire burned around 150 hectares of Llanwonno mountain, above Blaenllechau and Ferndale. So, before the winter rain arrives, will you ensure that Natural Resources Wales and RCT carry out a co-ordinated inspection of that hillside, its drainage and culverts, with the Mining Remediation Authority checking any relevant higher category coal tips within or below that affected area, and report the findings and any remedial work required to the Senedd by the end of October? Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
6. Reform UK Debate: Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board health visitor pay dispute en
In Rhondda and Ogmore, a health visitor is often the first to notice a baby not feeding, a mother not coping, a home not safe. I accept that the board is the employer and banding must follow NHS job evaluation—the Cabinet Minister cannot sign a payslip. But this dispute has outlasted three First Ministers, and the fourth signed the demand himself—a joint open letter, on 17 April, calling for band 7. Health visitors have now publicly called on him to honour that support. Unite said the board's grading matched the roles to band 7. The board says its revaluation contains band 6. Publish the date, job descriptions, evaluation, records, scores and review rights; explain the differences. That is where a fair offer starts. Amendment 4 replaces a call for immediate action with recognition of negotiations and the Chief Nursing Officer for Wales's review. In August, the health unions refused to take part in that job description work. Their reason: social partnership has broken down. My freedom of information request asked whether maternity staff were deployed into health visiting between 23 February and 4 August, when Tirion's suspension was announced. The board's 8 September response did not address that question. My 9 September follow-up requested an answer by 23 September. Cabinet Minister, on 17 June, you told this Chamber you'd expect the parties to get back around the table. Three months later, what has your personal intervention achieved? What still prevents agreement? When will that review report? And what has this Government done in four months to act on the First Minister's own signature? I ask for three commitments. First, within 14 days, publish the banding records and a resolution timetable naming who is accountable. Secondly, publish verified monthly figures for contacts due, completed and outstanding, alongside safeguarding referrals by council area and a recovery plan prioritising children at greatest risk. Thirdly, demonstrate that cover arrangements are safe, supervised and do not weaken other services. Families need to know when help will reach them. Staff need to know when their case will be decided. This Government needs to answer both. Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
3. Statement by the First Minister: Weather, wildfires, drought and resilience en
I would like to declare an interest, having worked for South Wales Fire and Rescue Service for over 20 years. First Minister, I thank our firefighters, control staff and support teams. On 13 August, joint fire control handled over 1,000 calls. At one point, south Wales crews faced 14 wildfires simultaneously. Afan Ogwr Rhondda needs well-trained crews, the right equipment and reliable water supplies, even in drought. On 23 July, your Cabinet Minister announced a review of firefighting capability and costs. Will you publish a costed plan by 31 October, agreed with all three fire services, identifying what must improve, who is responsible, and what will be delivered before next spring? Your Government extended the intervention in south Wales, where commissioners set the levy paid by local councils. Will your draft budget fund those improvements so councils are not left to meet the additional costs? Diolch.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
-
Nobody in this Chamber disputes that preventing illness is better than treating it. But look at the evidence in my constituency. Swansea bay has been under targeted intervention for cancer since 24 January, and on the latest published figures, its bowel screening uptake is the lowest in Wales, at around 57 per cent in the most deprived communities, compared with around 72 per cent in the least deprived. Prevention is falling short precisely where it is needed most. Analysis by the future generations commissioner also found that less than 10 per cent of the previous Welsh Government's budget was directed towards evidence-based primary prevention. Warm words about prevention have never been in short supply in this Chamber; budgets and screening programmes have. So, Deputy Minister, will your Government do better? When will eligible people across Wales begin receiving invitations for the national lung cancer screening programme? And will the first budget increase the proportion spent on evidence-based primary prevention? Thank you.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
2. Questions to the Cabinet Minister for Education and the Welsh Language en
I respect the Welsh language and recognise its importance to our national heritage, but respect for the language does not remove the duty to demonstrate value for money. My constituents in Afan Ogwr Rhondda expect evidence that public spending delivers real outcomes, not simply larger budgets. Where millions of pounds are being invested in promoting the Welsh language, every pound of taxpayers' money should deliver measurable results and genuine value. Can the Cabinet Minister, therefore, explain what measurable evidence the Welsh Government has that this investment is increasing the everyday use of Welsh in communities such as Afan Ogwr Rhondda, rather than simply expanding programme strategies and administration? Will she commit to publishing, constituency by constituency, how much public money has been spent, what outcomes have been achieved and how value for money has been assessed, so that this Senedd can judge successfully on evidence, not aspiration? Thank you.
2 contributions
Open this sitting on the stage
2. Questions to the Counsel General cy
3. Pa rôl sydd gan y Cwnsler Cyffredinol o ran sicrhau bod cyrff cyhoeddus yng Nghymru yn cydymffurfio â'u dyletswyddau cyfreithiol? OQ64242
Official English translation
3. What role does the Counsel General have in ensuring public bodies in Wales comply with their legal duties? OQ64242
No broadcast timestamp published, so this contribution cannot be placed on the stage. Senedd TV Read this in the Record
2. Questions to the Counsel General en
Thank you, Counsel General. I accept that Wales has an extensive framework of accountability in place: the courts, the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, the Auditor General for Wales and the Information Commissioner. Each has an important role to play, but the rule of law begins with Government itself. Through my own scrutiny work and freedom of information requests, I have seen how questions can arise over transparency, governance and compliance with legal duties. In one internal review into a series of my environmental information requests related to Community Energy Wales, the Welsh Government accepts that it has grouped five separate requests together, failed to explain the basis for doing so in its original response and apologised for that oversight. That raises a much broader constitutional question. As the Welsh Government's law officer, what assurance can you give this Senedd that Ministers, Government departments and publicly funded bodies comply with their legal duties from the outset, rather than leaving citizens to fight through complaints, internal reviews and appeals to secure the outcome the law already requires?
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
-
Diolch. It is with great sadness that I rise to pay tribute to Caroline Jones, a former Member of the Senedd and a woman whose courage, kindness and dedication to others left a lasting mark on Wales. Caroline was, above all else, a public servant. Throughout her life, she devoted herself to helping others, supporting charities, veterans, homeless people, women's refuges, children's organisations, and countless community causes. She gave her time generously and worked tirelessly to improve the lives of those around her. Her commitment to others was perhaps most evident in her support for women facing breast cancer. She faced that battle herself. Caroline became a mentor and source of hope for many women confronting the same diagnosis. She showed extraordinary courage, refusing to allow illness to define her life or limit her ambitions. Indeed, one of the most remarkable examples of her resilience was her election to this Senedd while continuing treatment for cancer. That achievement reflected not only her determination, but also her unwavering belief in public service and her desire to make a difference. Caroline was also a proud advocate for veterans, inspired by her father's military service and strengthened by her husband's distinguished career in the armed forces. She championed those who had served our country and never missed an opportunity to support their causes. Those who knew Caroline speak of her warmth, her generosity, her sense of humour and her ability to make people feel valued and welcome. She touched countless lives through friendship, compassion and simple acts of kindness. Today we remember not only a former Member of this Senedd, but a remarkable woman whose legacy of courage, service and kindness will endure. Our thoughts and deepest condolences are with her husband, Alun, her family, her friends and all those lives she touched. May she rest in peace.
1 contribution
Open this sitting on the stage
1. Questions to the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Minister for Social Justice and Equality en
I thank the Member for the question. Food poverty is a serious issue, but it cannot be an excuse to lower food standards or short-change Welsh farmers. Earlier this year, it emerged that Welsh councils were serving schoolchildren chicken imported from Thailand and China—99 nine per cent of supply in Merthyr Tydfil and 87 per cent in Caerphilly. That is difficult to justify when Welsh farmers already meet some of the highest animal welfare and food production standards in the world, yet are expected to compete on an uneven playing field. Bridgend has shown that there is no justification for this failure, sourcing 100 per cent UK chicken for its schools within the very same funding envelope and procurement framework. So, will the Cabinet Secretary accept that public money should never be used to buy food produced to standards that would not be permitted in Wales, and will the Welsh Government now reform procurement rules and require full transparency on food provenance, so parents know exactly where the food served in Welsh schools comes from? Thank you.
Written questions
52 written questions on record from the Seventh Senedd on, newest first.
WQ100832 · Tabled · Answered
Has the Welsh Government discussed with employers or trade unions the cost of moving health visitors up to band 7 as per the NHS Agenda for Change since 13 May 2026, and if so, on what dates?
Answered by Cabinet Minister for Health and Care
The Welsh Government has not undertaken an estimate or modelling exercise on the cost of moving health visitors employed at Band 6 to Band 7 under Agenda for Change. The current dispute is a local employment matter between Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board and recognised trade unions. The Welsh Government has discussed a range of issues relating to the dispute with NHS employers and trade unions. However, no separate programme of discussions has been undertaken specifically on the cost of moving health visitors to Band 7.
WQ100827 · Tabled · Answered
Has the Welsh Government modelled the cost of moving health visitors in Wales up to band 7 as per the NHS Agenda for Change, and if so, when?
Answered by Cabinet Minister for Health and Care
The Welsh Government has not undertaken an estimate or modelling exercise on the cost of moving health visitors employed at Band 6 to Band 7 under Agenda for Change. The current dispute is a local employment matter between Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board and recognised trade unions. The Welsh Government has discussed a range of issues relating to the dispute with NHS employers and trade unions. However, no separate programme of discussions has been undertaken specifically on the cost of moving health visitors to Band 7.
WQ100826 · Tabled · Answered
What is the Cabinet Minister's estimate of the annual cost, including employer oncosts, of moving all health visitors employed at band 6 by NHS Wales organisations up to band 7 as per the NHS Agenda for Change?
Answered by Cabinet Minister for Health and Care
The Welsh Government has not undertaken an estimate or modelling exercise on the cost of moving health visitors employed at Band 6 to Band 7 under Agenda for Change. The current dispute is a local employment matter between Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board and recognised trade unions. The Welsh Government has discussed a range of issues relating to the dispute with NHS employers and trade unions. However, no separate programme of discussions has been undertaken specifically on the cost of moving health visitors to Band 7.
WQ100825 · Tabled · Answered
What is the Cabinet Minister's estimate of the annual cost, including employer oncosts, of moving health visitors employed at band 6 by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board up to band 7 as per the NHS Agenda for Change?
Answered by Cabinet Minister for Health and Care
The Welsh Government has not undertaken an estimate or modelling exercise on the cost of moving health visitors employed at Band 6 to Band 7 under Agenda for Change. The current dispute is a local employment matter between Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board and recognised trade unions. The Welsh Government has discussed a range of issues relating to the dispute with NHS employers and trade unions. However, no separate programme of discussions has been undertaken specifically on the cost of moving health visitors to Band 7.
WQ100468 · Tabled · Answered
Further to WQ100035, what arrangements has the Cabinet Minister put in place to independently assure the Commissioners' assessment of whether South Wales Fire and Rescue Authority is ready to return to local democratic control, and will that assurance be published before any decision is taken to end the intervention?
Answered by Cabinet Minister for Local Government, Housing and Planning
As I set out in August, the Commissioners will report to me on progress against their terms of reference and the preparedness of South Wales Fire and Rescue Service to continue to improve under new governance arrangements. I will make my decision based on their advice and other supporting evidence and will make a statement to the Senedd at the appropriate time.
Official verbatim record: each question and answer as the Record prints it. Answers are signed with a job title, as published.
Contributions by topic, in Plenary
Topics are assigned by Siambr, not the Senedd: from the portfolio an item’s title names, else a keyword in the title. A vote takes the topic of the debate it decided. A speech is counted under its item’s topic; chairing is not counted.
- 1 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Housing & Social Justice.
Most-said phrases: per cent (3)
- 2 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Constitution & External Affairs.
Most-said phrases: legal duties (3)
- 2 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Economy & Welsh Tax.
- 1 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Education & Welsh Language.
- 3 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Health & Social Care.
Most-said phrases: per cent (3)
- 1 of their 23 contributions were on items classified Climate Change & Transport.
- 13 of their 23 contributions were on items not classified.
Most-said phrases: natural resources (8), health board (4), rugby union (4), told this chamber (4), band 7 (3)
Phrases are two or three words said at least three times in the English text of their speeches. A Welsh speech is counted in the Record’s translation. Matching is whole-word and exact, as in the phrase panel. A phrase that starts or ends with a stop word is left out. Each phrase opens the panel for this Member.
Stop words left out (262)
a, about, above, after, again, against, all, already, also, always, am, an, and, another, any, are, aren't, around, as, at, away, back, be, because, been, before, being, below, between, both, but, by, cabinet, can, can't, cannot, chair, committee, could, couldn't, counsel, deputy, did, didn't, do, does, doesn't, doing, don't, down, during, each, even, ever, few, first, for, from, further, general, get, gets, getting, give, given, go, going, gone, got, government, had, hadn't, has, hasn't, have, haven't, having, he, he'd, he'll, he's, her, here, here's, hers, herself, him, himself, his, how, how's, i, i'd, i'll, i'm, i've, if, in, into, is, isn't, it, it's, its, itself, just, know, let's, like, llywydd, look, make, makes, making, many, may, me, member, members, might, minister, ministers, more, most, much, must, mustn't, my, myself, need, needs, new, no, nor, not, now, of, off, officer, on, once, one, ones, only, or, other, ought, our, ours, ourselves, out, over, own, presiding, put, question, questions, really, said, same, say, saying, says, secretary, see, seen, senedd, shan't, she, she'd, she'll, she's, should, shouldn't, so, some, statement, such, take, taken, taking, than, thank, thanks, that, that's, the, their, theirs, them, themselves, then, there, there's, these, they, they'd, they'll, they're, they've, thing, things, think, this, those, through, to, today, too, two, under, until, up, upon, us, very, wales, want, wants, was, wasn't, way, ways, we, we'd, we'll, we're, we've, well, welsh, were, weren't, what, what's, when, when's, where, where's, whether, which, while, who, who's, whom, why, why's, will, with, won't, would, wouldn't, yes, yet, you, you'd, you'll, you're, you've, your, yours, yourself, yourselves
Votes by topic
Topics are assigned by Siambr, not the Senedd: from the portfolio an item’s title names, else a keyword in the title. A vote takes the topic of the debate it decided. These are counts of ballots, not stances. A vote on a motion is not a position on a topic.
| Topic | For | Against | Abstain | Did not vote | Divisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Housing & Social Justice | 1of 3 | 2of 3 | 0of 3 | 0of 3 | 3 |
| Constitution & External Affairs | 2of 7 | 5of 7 | 0of 7 | 0of 7 | 7 |
| Economy & Welsh Tax | 5of 15 | 10of 15 | 0of 15 | 0of 15 | 15 |
| Education & Welsh Language | 1of 2 | 0of 2 | 1of 2 | 0of 2 | 2 |
| Health & Social Care | 9of 15 | 5of 15 | 1of 15 | 0of 15 | 15 |
| Climate Change & Transport | 6of 12 | 6of 12 | 0of 12 | 0of 12 | 12 |
| Not classified | 10of 16 | 5of 16 | 1of 16 | 0of 16 | 16 |
Roll-call divisions, by sitting day
70 recorded votes. Official division result.
- For
- 34
- Against
- 33
- Abstain
- 3
- Did not vote
- 0
Counted by Siambr: a sum of the official division rows.
For Against Abstain Unlit desk: did not vote
3 divisions
Members' Legislative Debate under Standing Order 11.21(iv): An NHS first Bill
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Abstain Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 10 for · 2 against · 19 abstain · 2 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: Prostate cancer strategy
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
Welsh Labour Debate: The M4 around Newport
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
3 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Local referendums on council tax rises
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
6 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Regional rugby
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 1 abstain · 2 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: Access to HMOs and social housing for foreign nationals
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan a Lynne Neagle Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
Member Debate under Standing Order 11.21(iv): Family Drug and Alcohol Courts
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 1 abstain · 2 did not vote
1 division
Debate: Fiscal Reform
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
4 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Default 20 mph speed limit
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 1 for · 30 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 1 for · 30 against · 2 did not vote
Welsh Conservatives Debate: The defence sector
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
5 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Wales and the United Kingdom
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
Welsh Labour Debate: Further education
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
10 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Grooming gangs
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Paul Davies For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended Abstain Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 2 against · 29 abstain · 2 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board health visitor pay dispute
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 4tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 3tabled in the name of Paul Davies For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
5 divisions
Welsh Conservatives Debate: Deposit-return scheme
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: Bovine TB
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
Member Debate under Standing Order 11.21(iv): Young people and employment
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
2 divisions
Legislative Consent Motion: Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 32 for · 1 did not vote
Debate: The First Supplementary Budget 2026-27
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 32 against · 1 did not vote
4 divisions
Member Debate under Standing Order 11.21(iv): Ophthalmology services
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: The tourism sector
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
4 divisions
Debate: Fair Funding
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Llŷr Powell For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 for · 2 did not vote
- Amendment 3tabled in the name of Paul Davies Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
- Motion Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 31 against · 2 did not vote
4 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Nation of Sanctuary
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
Welsh Labour Debate: Funding for additional learning needs in the first Supplementary Budget 2026-27
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
10 divisions
Welsh Conservatives Debate: Hospital services and hospital closures
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 3tabled in the name of Llŷr Powell For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 4tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
- Motion as amended For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: A Welsh Rivers Act
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 3tabled in the name of Paul Davies For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 for · 4 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle Against Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 29 against · 4 did not vote
4 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Government international spending
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 1 for · 29 against · 3 did not vote
- Motion as amended Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 against · 3 did not vote
Reform UK Debate: Statutory register for lobbyists
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 3 did not vote
5 divisions
Reform UK Debate: Childcare offer
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion For Not agreed Party tally Reform UK: 32 for · 1 did not vote
- Amendment 1tabled in the name of Heledd Fychan Against Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 32 against · 1 did not vote
- Amendment 2tabled in the name of Lynne Neagle For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 30 for · 2 abstain · 1 did not vote
- Motion as amended For Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 11 for · 20 against · 1 abstain · 1 did not vote
Welsh Labour Debate: School support staff negotiating body
Watch it in the chamber Read the debate
- Motion Abstain Agreed Party tally Reform UK: 32 abstain · 1 did not vote